According to Nobel Prize-winning neuroscientist Eric Kandel, the similar thread in such disabilities is the division of our attention. He went on to point out that the richness of ones thoughts, memory and personalities hinges on once capacity to focus the brain and sustain concentration Carr, These associations are crucial when it comes to mastering complex ideas and critical thinking.
This scenario conforms to the words of the Roman philosopher Seneca who pointed out 2, years ago that to be everywhere is to be nowhere Carr, The deep dependence on the internet is also impacting negatively on the performance of students in their school work. In a single research experiment that was carried out at a US university, half a class of students were allowed to use internet-connected laptops during their lectures, while the other half were asked to shut down their computers.
At the end of this experiment, it was established that the students who were allowed to use internet-connected laptops during their lectures performed much worse on a subsequent test Carr, The above cases are a clear indication that though the internet is good, it has a dark side to it. This is so it tends to impact negatively on ones thinking capacity, concentration levels and retention of information.
If this trend goes on, then we as humans are putting ourselves at greater risks of not been able to fully realize and utilize the power of our brains, i. Such a scenario is very dangerous since it makes us to become unable to think even when it comes to making simple decisions. With this regard, it like the web has become a drug which we have to use in order for us to function properly.
Carr gives credit to the web for making research which initially used to take days available in a matter of minutes Carr, But what one gets comes at a huge cost. Carr is of the opinion that concertation and deeper contemplation is what people are giving up. Moreover, one might be good at multitasking, but creativity would be affected significantly. Since creativity is as a result of critical thinking, the heavy reliance on the web tends to negatively impact ones deeper thinking hence hindering them from becoming creative.
What we as humans are sacrificing in our surfing and searching is our capability to engage in the quieter, attentive modes of thoughts which underpins contemplation, deliberation and self-analysis Carr, His claim that the Internet changes our way of thinking by changing our expectations on what we read falls a little flat without his or the authority of his friends being made known. He cites a study, done by researchers at the University College London, in which the way users of research sites were observed to only skim the pages and move from one topic to the next, never coming back.
This was a study well done by a well known university, and thus a good source to cite. He only states what was learned in the study and fails to make a claim, thus missing the chance to connect such a strong source to his argument.
This time he states that the internet is changing our way of reading, but does not say if he considers this good or bad. The third source he quotes is Friedrich Nietzsche, saying that in he bought a typewriter and said it changed his writing style.
It is not on the same level as the other sources he uses. It is an argument that works with few people. If this article were better organized it might be more convincing. It was the first-person shooting game. I never experienced anything like it. I felt as if I am a cowboy on a mission to shoot those bad guys.
Since very early age, I have been so fascinated by computers. Computer became a big part of my daily life. And when things become this way, using internet becomes inevitable.
I am nineteen years old now. I always hated reading books, frankly until this day. Carr does not focus merely on the way people read in result of using Google, but he also states that it changes the process of thought.
Also, when the way that we think is affected, who we are as persons is affected inevitably. The article contains the study that shows people tend to skim when they read online. The way we read has changed. Therefore, we are different people from who we might have been without the invention of computer.
This reference strengthens his assumption that how we read weights heavy significance on how we think and who we are.
Nicholas Carr is the author of The Shallows and The Glass Cage: Automation and Us. He has written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and Wired.
Review of "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", article written by Nicholas Carr for students, fashionlosdaeroh.cf Summary of Is Google Making Us Stupid? Essays are of different types, and .
Is Google Making Us Stupid?, by Nicholas Carr Words | 6 Pages. The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson. The first of the many ideas conveyed in Carr’s article is that the brain is malleable like plastic. Is Google Making Us Stupid Summary and Analysis Is Google making us stupid summary and analysis takes a look at the works of Nicholas Carr. Is Google making .
Carr feels as if he losing the ability to control his own mind, not that he has lost it, but that it is changing. He believes the cause of this is the fact that the Internet has become a "universal medium for him" (). Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains (alternatively Is Google Making Us Stoopid?) is a magazine article by technology writer Nicholas G. Carr, and is highly critical of the Internet's effect on cognition. It was published in the July/August edition of The Atlantic magazine as a six-page cover story.